PENINGKATAN KREATIVITAS GURU BERBASIS LITERASI TEKNOLOGI DAN KEARIFAN LOKAL

Jurnal Pendidikan: Kajian dan Implementasi                                Vol. 6, No. 3 https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/jpki75                                   Agustus 2024

 

PENINGKATAN KREATIVITAS GURU BERBASIS LITERASI TEKNOLOGI DAN KEARIFAN LOKAL

Ruri Marlinawati¹, Titin Gustini², Nandang Hidayat³

^1,2,3Universitas Pakuan

ruribalfaz79@gmail.com¹, tiengustini17@gmail.com², mr.nandanghidayat@gmail.com³

 

Abstract

Globalization and the advancement of information and communication technology (ICT) demand teachers to improve their creativity in teaching continuously. One way to enhance  teacher  creativity  is  by  utilizing  technology  literacy  and  local  wisdom. Technology literacy enables teachers to use various digital tools and platforms to create engaging and interactive learning experiences. Local wisdom, on the other hand, can be a source of inspiration for teachers to develop teaching materials and methods that are relevant to the local cultural context. This article discusses the concepts of technology literacy and local wisdom, as well as how these two things can be used to enhance teacher creativity. The article also provides some best practice examples from teachers who have successfully implemented technology literacy and local wisdom in their teaching.

Keywords: Teacher Creativity, Technology Literacy, Local Wisdom, Learning.

 

Abstrak

Globalisasi dan kemajuanteknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) menuntut guru untuk terus meningkatkan kreativitasnya dalam mengajar. Salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan kreativitas guru adalah dengan memanfaatkan literasi teknologi dan kearifan lokal. Literasi teknologi memungkinkan guru untuk menggunakan berbagai alat dan platform digital untuk menciptakan pembelajaran yang menarik dan interaktif. Kearifan lokal, di sisi lain, dapat menjadi sumber inspirasi bagi guru untuk mengembangkan materi dan metode pembelajaran yang relevan dengan konteks budaya lokal. Artikel ini membahas tentang konsep literasi teknologi dan kearifan lokal, serta bagaimana kedua hal tersebut dapat digunakan untuk meningkatkan kreativitas guru. Artikel ini juga memberikan beberapa contoh praktik terbaik dari guru-guru yang telah berhasil menerapkan literasi teknologi dan kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran mereka.

Kata Kunci:Kreativitas Guru, Literasi Teknologi, Kearifan Lokal, Pembelajaran.

URL Artikel: https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/jpki/article/view/2799/2821 

Strategies for Increasing Professional Commitment of Private Vocational High School Teachers

 

Strategies for Increasing Professional Commitment of Private Vocational High School Teachers

Oleh: Nandang Hidayat, Yuyun Elisabeth Patras, Ikhsan Ikhsan, Andri Kusuma Wardani

Abstract

Teachers' professional commitment is an essential factor in the human resource management of a school. One of the causes of high teacher turnover in private schools is their low professional commitment. The impact of high teacher turnover is low school performance. This study aims to examine the structural model of the causality relationship between personal values and transformational leadership of school principals with teachers' professional commitment both directly and through job satisfaction as a mediator variable. Another interesting finding in the study is that teachers' professional commitment is also indirectly affected by the Principal's transformational leadership and teachers' personal values. In this context, teacher job satisfaction acts as a reasonably effective mediator between the Principal's transformational leadership, the teacher's personal values, and the teacher's professional commitment. The study's findings imply that strategies for increasing teachers' professional commitment should be designed with attention to principals' transformational leadership that can create job satisfaction among teachers. In addition, the Principal should strive to create an organizational environment that fosters the teacher's personal values that align with the school's vision and culture.

Keywords

 

job satisfaction personal values professional commitment transformational leadership

http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-7-2023.2341148

Optimizing Academic Achievement through Comprehensive Integration of Formative Assessment into Teaching

Nandang Hidayat & Iyan Irdiyansyah

Abstract: Learning activities are conducted to help students achieve optimal academic achievement. This research aims to optimize student academic achievement through a learning process that integrates comprehensive formative assessments, including formative tests, self-assessment, peer assessment, and the initiator of creating summaries or concept maps that are given to students in a structured manner at the end of every lesson. The research method used was a quasi-experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. Students enrolled in the biology education program of the basic physics course for the 1st semester of the 2019 academic year participated in this study. The participants were 66 undergraduate students divided into two classes. Thirty-four students in the experimental group were in class A, while 32 students in the control group were in class B. Data were collected using a learning outcome test instrument to measure academic achievement, which was tested at the end of the semester. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. This study concluded that a learning process that includes comprehensive formative assessment significantly affects students' academic achievement. These findings support the theory that formative assessment provides feedback, correction, and improvement in student learning. 

Keywords: Academic achievement, formative assessment, peer assessment, self-assessment, structured assignments.

To cite this article: Hidayat, N., & Irdiyansyah, I. (2023). Optimizing academic achievement through comprehensive integration of formative assessment into teaching. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.12.1.71

References 

Al Tayib Umar, A. M., & Ameen, A. A. (2021). The effects of formative evaluation on students’ achievement in english for specific purposes (a case study of the preparatory year students at Umm- Al-Qura University). World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V11N2P107 

Amanonce, J. C. T., & Maramag, A. M. (2020). Licensure examination performance and academic achievement of teacher education graduates. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20614 

Amir, S., & Marisda, D. H. (2021). Effectiveness of guided inquiry learning models viewed from physics learning achievements. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i2.8630 

Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2016.1275185 

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087 

Asadi, M., Azizinezhad, M., & Fard, E. E. (2017). Formative assessment and feedback as predictors of students’ engagement. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12933 

Asghar, M. (2012). The lived experience of formative assessment practice in a British university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.606901 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807 

Braund, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018). Elementary students as active agents in their learning: An empirical study of the connections between assessment practices and student metacognition. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0265-z 

Bulut, O., Cutumisu, M., Aquilina, A. M., & Singh, D. (2019). Effects of digital score reporting and feedback on students’ learning in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00065 

Cagliero, L., Farinetti, L., & Baralis, E. (2019). Recommending personalized summaries of teaching materials. IEEE Access, 7(1), 22729–22739. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899655 

Carrillo-De-La-Peña, M. T., Baillès, E., Caseras, X., Martínez, À., Ortet, G., & Pérez, J. (2009). Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9086-y 

Chen, Z., Jiao, J., & Hu, K. (2021). Formative assessment as an online instruction intervention: Student engagement, outcomes, and perceptions. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa1 

Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1634040 

Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522 

Dalby, D., & Swan, M. (2019). Using digital technology to enhance formative assessment in mathematics classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12606 

Dang, N. V., Chiang, J. C., Brown, H. M., & McDonald, K. K. (2018). Curricular activities that promote metacognitive skills impact lower-performing students in an introductory biology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), Article 1324. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1324 

Dayal, H. (2021). How teachers use formative assessment strategies during teaching: Evidence from the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n7.1 

de Aguiar, V., Zhao, Y., Ficek, B. N., Webster, K., Rofes, A., Wendt, H., Frangakis, C., Caffo, B., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., & Tsapkini, K. (2020). Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Cortex, 124, 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.001 

Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020). Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Science Education, 104(2), 290–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21559 

Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 

Ferdinal, & Isramirawati. (2021). The impact of formative assessment on students’ academic achievement. In N. A. Syah, I. Revita, A. Al-Muallem, Djusmalinar & V. Maun (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020) (pp. 126–134). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.024 

Ferm Almqvist, C., Vinge, J., Väkevä, L., & Zandén, O. (2017). Assessment as learning in music education: The risk of “criteria compliance” replacing “learning” in the Scandinavian countries. Research Studies in Music Education, 39(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X16676649 

Fleary, S. A., Freund, K. M., & Nigg, C. R. (2022). Development and validation of assessments of adolescent health literacy: A Rasch measurement model approach. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 585. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12924-4 

Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019). Optimising moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4 

Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I., Lukáč, S., Ješková, Z., Jurková, V., & Orosová, R. (2021). Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204 

Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2017). Formative assessment to support students’ competences in inquiry-based science education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), Article 1673. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1673 

Gunawan, Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Nisrina, N. (2018). Improving students’ creativity using cooperative learning with virtual media on static fluida concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, Article 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012016 

Hamodi, C., López-Pastor, V. M., & López-Pastor, A. T. (2017). If I experience formative assessment whilst studying at university, will I put it into practice later as a teacher? Formative and shared assessment in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1281909 

Han, H. S. (2022). The effectiveness of weighted least squares means and variance adjusted based fit indices in assessing local dependence of the Rasch model: Comparison with principal component analysis of residuals. PLOS ONE, 17(9), Article 0271992. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271992 

Hotaman, D. (2020). The effect of formative assessment on the academic achievement levels of prospective teachers. European Journal of Educational Research 83 Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(3), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n3p33 

Indihadi, D., Suryana, D., & Ahmad, A. B. (2022). The analysis of construct validity of Indonesian creativity scale using Rasch model. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.15182 

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4 

Jatmiko, B., Widodo, W., Martini, Budiyanto, M., Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2016). Effectiveness of the INQF-based learning on a general physics for improving student’s learning outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.441 

Jean de Dieu, H., & Zhou, K. (2021). Physical literacy assessment tools: A systematic literature review for why, what, who, and how. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), Article 7954. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157954 

Jessop, T., & Tomas, C. (2017). The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1217501 

Kippers, W. B., Wolterinck, C. H. D., Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ views on the use of assessment for learning and data-based decision making in classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015 

Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: Assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017 

Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. L. (2018). Teacher AfL perceptions and feedback practices in mathematics education among secondary schools in Tanzania. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.01.004 

Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. L. (2019). Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26(3), 278–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593103 

Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2021). Formative assessment as practice: The role of students’ motivation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228 

Linn, Z., Tashiro, Y., Morio, K., & Hori, H. (2022). Peer evaluations of group work in different years of medical school and academic achievement: How are they related? BMC Medical Education, 22, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03165-5 

Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 

Mackintosh-Franklin, D. C. (2021). An evaluation of formative feedback and its impact on undergraduate student nurse academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 50, Article 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102930 

Malone, T. (2021). Effective formative assessment strategies contribute positively to the work-readiness of new graduates in higher education. Scope, (10), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.34074/scop.4010001 

Marinelli, L., Trompetto, C., Canneva, S., Mori, L., Nobili, F., Fattapposta, F., Curra, A., Abbruzzese, G., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2017). Learning “how to learn”: Super declarative motor learning is impaired in parkinson’s disease. Neural Plasticity, 17, Article 3162087. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3162087 

McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), Article 1754761. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761 

McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121289 

Miller, D., & Lavin, F. (2007). ‘But now I feel I want to give it a try’: Formative assessment, self-esteem and a sense of competence. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701292109 

Molin, F., Cabus, S., Haelermans, C., & Groot, W. (2021). Toward reducing anxiety and increasing performance in physics education: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Research in Science Education, 51, 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9845-9 

Mtshali, T. I., Ramaligela, S. M., & Makgato, M. (2021). Actualisation of practical lessons through assessment in civil technology. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2021.13.01.005 

Na, S. J., Ji, Y. G., & Lee, D. H. (2021). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy to formative assessment in real-time online classes in Korea. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 33(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3946/KJME.2021.199 

Naseer Ud Din, M., Faizi, W. U. N., & Khan, A. M. (2018). Impact of formative assessment and feedback on higher education. Global Social Sciences Review, 3(4), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(iii-iv).34 

Nikolic, S., Stirling, D., & Ros, M. (2018). Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self- and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569 

Ozan, C., & Kıncal, R. Y. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0216 

Pailai, J., Wunnasri, W., Yoshida, K., Hayashi, Y., & Hirashima, T. (2017). The practical use of Kit-Build concept map on formative assessment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0060-x 

Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Using formative assessment to influence self- and coregulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8 

Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823 

Patra, I., Alazemi, A., Al-Jamal, D., & Gheisari, A. (2022). The effectiveness of teachers’ written and verbal corrective feedback (CF) during formative assessment (FA) on male language learners’ academic anxiety (AA), academic performance (AP), and attitude toward learning (ATL). Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00169-2 

Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: mediated by feedback’s perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004 

Richards-Babb, M., Curtis, R., Ratcliff, B., Roy, A., & Mikalik, T. (2018). General chemistry student attitudes and success with use of online homework: Traditional-responsive versus adaptive-responsive. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00829 

Romero, R., Castrejon, F., López, V., & Fraile, A. (2017). Evaluación formativa, competencias comunicativas y TIC en la formación del profesorado [Formative assessment, communication skills and ICT in initial teacher training]. Comunicar, XXV(52), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.3916/C52-2017-07 

Sagarika, R. H., Kandakatla, R., & Gulhane, A. (2021). Role of learning analytics to evaluate formative assessments: Using a data driven approach to inform changes in teaching practices. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 550–556. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157212 

Sancho‐Zamora, R., Hernández‐perlines, F., Peña‐garcía, I., & Gutiérrez‐broncano, S. (2022). The impact of absorptive capacity on innovation: The mediating role of organizational learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), Article 19020842. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842 

Selvaraj, A. M., & Azman, H. (2020). Reframing the effectiveness of feedback in improving teaching and learning achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20654 

Sriyanto, & Sukarelawan, M. I. (2021). Improving the students’ physics learning outcomes using macromedia flash in SMAN 2 Bantul. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 178–184. 

Suciati, Munadi, S., Sugiman, & Ratna, W. D. (2020). Design and validation of mathematical literacy instruments for assessment for learning in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.865 

Sujito, Pratiwi, H. Y., Soewono, E., Suhandi, A., & Liliasari, S. (2021). Views and practices of mathematical method for physics lecture at pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, Article 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012001 

Sumanik, N. B., Nurvitasari, E., Maarebia, R. Z., Pasaribu, Y. P., Buyang, Y., Rettob, A. L., & Genisa, J. (2020). The influence of POGIL learning model by mind mapping and summary assignment of salt hydrolysis outcomes. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 473, Article 012136. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012136 

Sun, Q., Wu, J., Rong, W., & Liu, W. (2019). Formative assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review: Implementation and experience report. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 24(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2018.9010109 

Sutarno, S., Putri, D. H., Risdianto, E., Satriawan, M., & Malik, A. (2021). The students’ physics problem solving skills in basic physics course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731, Article 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1731/1/012078 

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734- 017-0220-3 

Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., Mittelmeier, J., & Nguyen, Q. (2018). Student profiling in a dispositional learning analytics application using formative assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.010 

Thyer, B. A. (2012). Quasi-experimental research designs. Oxford University Press, Inc. Tigelaar, D., & Sins, P. (2021). Effects of formative assessment programmes on teachers’ knowledge about supporting students’ reflection. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 73(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1726992 

Torre, D. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2020). Theoretical considerations on programmatic assessment. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1672863 

Treve, M. (2021). English for academic purposes (EAP) lecturers’ perceptions of formative assessment integration in the Thai EAP context. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1096–1113. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.77 

Vettori, G., Vezzani, C., Bigozzi, L., & Pinto, G. (2018). The mediating role of conceptions of learning in the relationship between metacognitive skills/strategies and academic outcomes among middle-school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01985 

Webb, M. E., Prasse, D., Phillips, M., Kadijevich, D. M., Angeli, C., Strijker, A., Carvalho, A. A., Andresen, B. B., Dobozy, E., & Laugesen, H. (2018). Challenges for IT-enabled formative assessment of complex 21st century skills. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9379-7 

Wuest, D. A., & Fisette, J. L. (2012). Foundations of physical education, exercise science, and sport (17th ed.). McGraw-Hill. 

Yakob, M., Hamdani, H., Sari, R. P., Haji, A. G., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Implementation of performance assessment in STEM based science learning to improve students’ habits of mind. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 624–631. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21084 

Yan, Z., & Brown, T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091 

Yan, Z., Chiu, M. M., & Ko, P. Y. (2020). Effects of self-assessment diaries on academic achievement, self-regulation, and motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(5), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1827221 

Yusefzadeh, H., Iranagh, J. A., & Nabilou, B. (2019). The effect of study preparation on test anxiety and performance: A quasi-experimental study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S192053 

Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 

Zulliger, S., Buholzer, A., & Ruelmann, M. (2022). Observed quality of formative peer and self-assessment in everyday mathematics teaching and its effects on student performance. European Journal of Educationa

Interactive Digital Comic Teaching Materials to Increase Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes

ByHusnul KhotimahInstitut Pembina Rohani Islam Jakarta

• Nandang HidayatUniversitas Pakuan Bogor
• https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE/article/view/46038 

Abstract. The digital era and the internet of things have had an impact on interaction patterns in learning activities. Online learning and teaching materials packaged in digital form have become a necessity. Teachers at the elementary school level are generally not ready for the demands of these changes, especially in developing digital teaching materials. This study aims to increase student involvement in the online independent learning process and learning outcomes by using interactive digital comics teaching materials. The research method used is the ADDIE model development research method (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate). This study involved 1373 students, 8 principals, and 20 teachers from 9 elementary schools who were selected as the pilot site in Tapos District, Depok City, West Java. Data was collected using instruments in the form of learning outcomes tests and questionnaires for students, teachers, and parents sent via a google form link. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistics, namely one-way ANOVA. This study concludes that the use of teaching materials packaged in the form of interactive digital comics with the theme “Movement Organs of Animals and Humans” sub-theme “Humans and the environment” has been proven to be effective in increasing the intensity of student involvement in online independent learning and the achievement of learning outcomes. The implication of the results of this study is that interactive digital comics are recommended for use in online independent learning for elementary school students.

DOI:  

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i2.46038

Optimizing Academic Achievement through Comprehensive Integration of Formative Assessment into Teaching

https://www.eu-jer.com/optimizing-academic-achievement-through-comprehensive-integration-of-formative-assessment-into-teaching

Abstract: Learning activities are conducted to help students achieve optimal academic achievement. This research aims to optimize student academic achievement through a learning process that integrates comprehensive formative assessments, including formative tests, self-assessment, peer assessment, and the initiator of creating summaries or concept maps that are given to students in a structured manner at the end of every lesson. The research method used was a quasi-experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. Students enrolled in the biology education program of the basic physics course for the 1st semester of the 2019 academic year participated in this study. The participants were 66 undergraduate students divided into two classes. Thirty-four students in the experimental group were in class A, while 32 students in the control group were in class B. Data were collected using a learning outcome test instrument to measure academic achievement, which was tested at the end of the semester. Data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. This study concluded that a learning process that includes comprehensive formative assessment significantly affects students' academic achievement. These findings support the theory that formative assessment provides feedback, correction, and improvement in student learning.

Keywords: Academic achievement, formative assessment, peer assessment, self-assessment, structured assignments.

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.71

PENINGKATAN KEINOVATIFAN GURU MELALUI PENGUATAN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK DAN LEARNING ORGANIZATION

https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/JMP/article/view/2765 

PENINGKATAN KEINOVATIFAN GURU MELALUI PENGUATAN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK DAN LEARNING ORGANIZATION

Dedi Usmayadi, Soewarto Hardhienata, Nandang Hidayat

Abstract

IMPROVING TEACHER INNOVATIVITY THROUGH STRENGTHENING PEDAGOGIC COMPETENCIES AND LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS

This study is intended to determine how teachers’ innovativeness can be improved by examining the relationship between teacher innovativeness with pedagogical competency variables and learning organizations The study was conducted using correlational statistical methods to determine whether pedagogical competency variables and learning organization have a positive relationship with teacher innovation. Based on these results, an analysis is then performed using the Sitorem Method to derive recommendations and determining the order of priority improvements that need to be implemented. The study was conducted to the government official teachers of  State Vocational School located in Bogor Regency where the total study population was 184 and the sample taken was 126 teachers. The results showed  that there was a positive relationship between pedagogical competence and teacher innovativeness where the relationship strength ry1 = 0.7655 and there was a positive relationship between learning organization and teacher innovativeness where the relationship strength ry2 = 0.2671. This proved that teacher innovation might be improved through strengthening the  pedagogical competencies and learning organizations.

Keywords

teacher innovation; pedagogical competence;, learning organization; sitorem analysis.

References

Aan Komariah dan Cepi Triatna. (2010). Visionary Leadership Menuju Sekolah Efektif. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Bui, H. T., & Baruch, Y. (2012). Learning organization in higher education: An empirical evaluation within an international context. Management Learning, 43(5), 515-544

Burke, Peter J. 2004. “Identities and Social Structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award Address.” Social Psychology Quarterly 67:5–15.

Colquitt, Jason A., Jeffery A. LePine, and Michael J. Wesson. 2015. Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment. Fourth Edi. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Detrer D. Joshua, Aaron J. Johnson, and Allan W. Gray. (2011). Innovativeness and Innovation : Implications for the Renewable Materials Suplly Chain. International Food and Agrobusiness Managemen Riveiw. Volume 14(2) : 17-34.

Dimovski, V., Penger, S., Škerlavaj, M.,& Žnidaršič, J. (2005). Učeča se organizacija Ustvarite podjetje znanja. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

Fuad Ihsan. (2009). Dasar-dasar Kependidikan. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Hardhienata, S., (2017). The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Manajement, IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering, volume 166, doi : 10.1088/1757-899X/166/I/012017.

Kunandar. 2009. Guru Profesional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru.Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Marquardt, Michael J. (2011). Building The Learning Organization. Boston : Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Mulyasa, E. (2007 ; 2013). Standar Kompetensi dan Sertifikasi Guru. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya

McShane, Steven L., Glinow, Mary Ann Von. (2008). Organizational Behavior / Steven L. McShane, Mary Ann Von Glinow (4th edition.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Tilaar. 2005.Manifesto Pendidikan Nasional; Tinjauan dari Perspektif Postmodernisme dan Studi Kultural. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Uhar Suharsaputra. (2010). Inovasi Pendidikan dan Peran Guru. Jakarta : Refika Aditama

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jmp.v8i2.2765

Pengembangan Media Membelajaran Berbasis Android pada Materi Sintesis Protein untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa

https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jber/article/view/2635 

Dipublikasikan dalam Journal of  Biology Educational Research (JBER) FKIP Universitas Pakuan, Vol 1, No 1 (2020)

Pengembangan Media Membelajaran Berbasis Android Pada Materi Sintesis Protein Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa

Meri Sri Susanti, Nandang Hidayat, Surti Kurniasih

Abstract

Abstrak

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan media pembelajaran berbasis Android pada materi sintesis protein untuk meningkatkan kompetensi siswa pada aspek kognitif. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian dan pengembangan atau Research and Development (R&D) dengan desain Four D. Penelitian melibatkan 3 orang validator dan 72 orang siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu lembar validasi ahli materi, lembar validasi ahli media, lembar validasi guru biologi, dan soal tes pilihan ganda pada materi sintesis protein. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa validasi media pembelajaran berbasis Android pada materi sintesis protein rata-rata sebesar 93% dengan kategori “Sangat Layak”. Kompetensi siswa meningkat dengan penggunaan media pembelajaran berbasis Android pada materi sintesis protein, hal ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil uji Mann Whitney. Berdasarkan hasil, penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa media pembelajaran berbasis Android pada materi sintesis protein dapat meningkatkan kompetensi siswa. Rekomendasi untuk penelitian lanjutan sebaiknya dilakukan uji coba pada skala luas dengan jumlah siswa yang lebih banyak agar didapatkan data yang lebih akurat.

 

Kata kunci: Media Pembelajaran berbasis Android, Sintesis Protein, Kompetensi Siswa.